Skip to main content
Viva Estate Lending WHERE HOMES BEGINS AND FINANCING FITS

Blog

Submitted by ptruong on

1. Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Reform

Trump has previously supported privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that back most U.S. mortgages.

Impact:

  • Privatization could reduce government backing for mortgages, potentially raising borrowing costs.
  • Could lead to less access to affordable mortgage loans, especially for first-time and low-income buyers.
  • Investors in GSEs could benefit, but consumers may see higher risk premiums on mortgages.

📉 2. Deregulation and Zoning Flexibility

Trump has historically promoted deregulation across industries, including real estate.

Impact:

  • Could ease local and federal zoning rules and development restrictions, promoting more housing starts.
  • May result in faster approval for developments, especially in suburban and rural areas.
  • However, this might create tension with local governments or environmental advocates.

💰 3. Lower Corporate & Capital Gains Taxes

Trump has proposed reducing capital gains taxes and extending cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Impact:

  • Could incentivize real estate investment, particularly in commercial and luxury sectors.
  • May lead to increased demand for investment properties and a rise in asset values.
  • Might reduce revenue for affordable housing programs if public funds are cut.

🧱 4. Opportunity Zones Expansion

Trump previously championed Opportunity Zones—designed to spur development in underserved areas.

Impact:

  • Expanding the program could attract private capital to distressed neighborhoods.
  • May promote long-term revitalization but also risk displacement and gentrification.

🏘️ 5. National Housing Policy Overhaul

A new Trump administration could push for broader national housing reforms.

Impact:

  • Potential creation of federal incentives for homebuilding or low-interest lending programs.
  • Focus could skew toward private-sector solutions over government-funded housing.

📊 Summary: What Trump Might Do

Action

Potential Benefit

Possible Risk

Privatize Fannie/Freddie

More market-driven lending

Higher mortgage rates

Deregulate zoning

More housing supply

Environmental/development pushback

Cut capital gains taxes

More real estate investment

Widen wealth gap

Expand Opportunity Zones

Revitalize communities

Risk of gentrification

Broaden housing policy

Boost supply via private sector

Less focus on affordability

 

🧠 Final Thought

If elected or influential, Trump could catalyze market-friendly, investor-focused changes that might benefit builders, developers, and high-income buyers. But middle-class affordability and long-term stability may depend on whether these policies balance private incentives with public needs.